Comments on: Herbert R. J. Grosch, 1918-2010 http://bit-player.org/2010/herbert-r-j-grosch-1918-2010 An amateur's outlook on computation and mathematics Tue, 07 May 2013 12:54:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: Elwood Downey http://bit-player.org/2010/herbert-r-j-grosch-1918-2010/comment-page-1#comment-2688 Elwood Downey Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:50:49 +0000 http://bit-player.org/?p=582#comment-2688 Warning: OT! Love your blog, just started reading it several days ago. Found it while surfing for opinions to help me decide whether to restart a subscription to Sci Am. I loved that mag in 70s and 80s but gave up in the 90s. Still no better with a new editor so I guess it's gone for good. Anyway! I've been going back through your entries and soon became aware it was rather annoying that the entries must be read from bottom-to-top, while of course within each entry one reads top-to-bottom. So when starting a new month I scroll clear to the bottom, scroll up slowly to find the top of the last (earliest) entry, then when finished slowly go back up /two/headings to find the next (newer), etc. Argh! Why not just put the newest entry at the bottom each time?? Then the whole thing reads nicely top-to-bottom. Thanks :-) Warning: OT!

Love your blog, just started reading it several days ago. Found it while surfing for opinions to help me decide whether to restart a subscription to Sci Am. I loved that mag in 70s and 80s but gave up in the 90s. Still no better with a new editor so I guess it’s gone for good.

Anyway! I’ve been going back through your entries and soon became aware it was rather annoying that the entries must be read from bottom-to-top, while of course within each entry one reads top-to-bottom. So when starting a new month I scroll clear to the bottom, scroll up slowly to find the top of the last (earliest) entry, then when finished slowly go back up /two/headings to find the next (newer), etc. Argh! Why not just put the newest entry at the bottom each time?? Then the whole thing reads nicely top-to-bottom.

Thanks :-)

]]> By: Nemo http://bit-player.org/2010/herbert-r-j-grosch-1918-2010/comment-page-1#comment-2661 Nemo Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:32:48 +0000 http://bit-player.org/?p=582#comment-2661 "Signed ternary" is almost certainly referring to "Balanced Ternary". <a href="http://www.americanscientist.org/issues/pub/third-base/" rel="nofollow">Here is one reference</a> describing balanced ternary, although I have a feeling you do not need it. :-) “Signed ternary” is almost certainly referring to “Balanced Ternary”.

Here is one reference describing balanced ternary, although I have a feeling you do not need it. :-)

]]>