<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Multicore madness</title>
	<link>http://bit-player.org/2007/multicore-madness</link>
	<description>An amateur's outlook on computation and mathematics.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Multicore madness by: realmode</title>
		<link>http://bit-player.org/2007/multicore-madness#comment-1517</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 02:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bit-player.org/2007/multicore-madness#comment-1517</guid>
					<description>I agree with randomwalker. Distributed computing will be a big deal. Multi-core, not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I agree with randomwalker. Distributed computing will be a big deal. Multi-core, not so much.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Multicore madness by: randomwalker</title>
		<link>http://bit-player.org/2007/multicore-madness#comment-1509</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 20:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bit-player.org/2007/multicore-madness#comment-1509</guid>
					<description>I have only once in recent memory asked a construction worker what he was building. The answer? &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Venetian_%28Las_Vegas%29&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the world's largest hotel&lt;/a&gt;.  Maybe all these construction guys are trained to say they're building the world's largest something-or-other :)

Your subtitle is definitely hyperbole. But meh, hyperbole makes good copy. We all do it.

I don't see multi-core as a big deal myself. Most end-users already have way more CPU cycles than they need. Video playback takes up what, 5% of CPU?

The real success story of parallelism is mapreduce and other server-farm techniques, which you mention; and those have nothing to do with multi-core.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I have only once in recent memory asked a construction worker what he was building. The answer? <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Venetian_%28Las_Vegas%29" rel="nofollow">the world&#8217;s largest hotel</a>.  Maybe all these construction guys are trained to say they&#8217;re building the world&#8217;s largest something-or-other :)</p>
	<p>Your subtitle is definitely hyperbole. But meh, hyperbole makes good copy. We all do it.</p>
	<p>I don&#8217;t see multi-core as a big deal myself. Most end-users already have way more CPU cycles than they need. Video playback takes up what, 5% of CPU?</p>
	<p>The real success story of parallelism is mapreduce and other server-farm techniques, which you mention; and those have nothing to do with multi-core.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
